CARINA JOHANSEN—NTB/AFP via Getty Images
All it took for Elon Musk to set the hearts of Tesla investors aflutter was one simple word.
A full week after Singapore-based billionaire Leo KoGuan warned only a stock buyback or 100% earnings growth would pull Tesla out of its current slump, Musk finally replied to his third largest shareholder.
“Noted,” he wrote on Thursday.
Minutes later the stock reversed its losses as investors took this as a clear sign that Musk might greenlight Tesla spending anywhere between $5 billion to even $10 billion on its first ever share buyback.
While Musk’s cryptic response may have left open what if anything he plans to do, he engages with his fan base on Twitter daily and their growing calls for a buyback will not have escaped his attention.
My thoughts on whether Tesla should issue debt to do a stock buyback now.@MartinViecha https://t.co/9mHIXHBATw
— Dave Lee (@heydave7) October 12, 2022
The Tesla CEO couldn’t have chosen the timing any better: His company could announce a buyback when it reports third-quarter earnings on Oct. 19, after which Musk is free to sell whatever stock he needs to raise cash for his looming Twitter purchase.
A Delaware judge has given him until Oct. 28to honor his $44 billion deal with the social media platform, or she will proceed with a five-day trial he’s widely expected to lose. The overhang from his pending acquisition has weighed heavily on sentiment as no one knows for certain just how many shares Musk may need to unload.
With the mood so grim, all it took for Tesla to hit a 52-week low on Thursday was the hotter-than-expected September inflation print of 8.2%. Later it even emerged Musk may be the subject of a federal investigation.
Adding to his Twitter problems is the possibility that third-party investors are bailing on his deal. Reports suggest investors who originally signed on to provide $7 billion—such as Manhattan Venture Partners and Apollo Global Management—may now pull their equity financing.
Tesla has valid arguments it can use next week to justify a buyback, should its board indeed approve one. Directors can argue buying back billions of dollars in the company’s own stock makes sense as the share price is weighed down by external factors such as the Federal Reserve’s rapid-fire rate hikes. With the company within arm’s reach of its blistering 50% annual volume growth target, a stock trading near one-year lows doesn’t properly reflect Tesla’s strong fundamentals.
Furthermore, any shares purchased before the end of the year would be exempt from an annual 1% tax, which will take effect in January as part of President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act.
Along with Apple, Tesla’s retail investor community is the largest among any mega-cap stock, according to Vanda Research, and no topic has been more hotly debated of late than a share buyback.
A snap poll conducted on Tuesday by popular Tesla influencer Steven Mark Ryan showed overwhelming support among the nearly 11,000 users surveyed.
Should Tesla buy back shares ASAP?
Current market cap approx $690B. In Oct 2022. WTF.
The consequences of this poll will be important. Please vote carefully.$TSLA @MartinViecha @elonmusk #Tesla #TeslaStock
— stevenmarkryan (@stevenmarkryan) October 11, 2022
‘Send a powerful signal’
One of those pushing heavily for a buyback is Alexandra Merz. The Tesla shareholder led a public campaign against the credit rating agencies that gave Tesla debt low market. After writing to them personally to urge them to upgrade Tesla debt from junk status, Merz posted their responses online.
“We’ve got our blood in this company, we all spend much too much time talking about it, doing stuff about it, investing into it, and all the rest,” she said in a podcast on Thursday. “I think there should be some reward for retail investors.”
The company has $18.3 billion in cash on hand, but there are questions as to how much of that is located in the U.S. Repatriating cash from abroad comes with a tax, which is why Apple issued bonds to fund its own buybacks.
“I want them to issue more debt, that was one of the reasons I was so much after this credit rating upgrade to investment grade, because that allows them to the issue bonds at a much lower spread, since they’re not junk rated,” Merz added.
Her sentiment reflects a broader shift among many small shareholders following the stock slump. Previously many argued Tesla should reinvest excess cash into growth. Musk has set the target of selling 20 million cars annually by the end of the decade, a 20-fold gain over last year, and this requires constant spending on new production capacity.
But the economic outlook for such investment has changed radically.
In order to maintain its zero-COVID policy, China is imposing rolling lockdowns that damper growth. Europe meanwhile is largely cut off from Russian natural gas, and is therefore actively destroying demand to conserve energy supplies for the winter. And in North America, the Federal Reserve is quickly putting the brakes on the housing market, which is crucial for overall economic growth. In this scenario, Tesla may be less inclined to pour billions into a new car factory for at least another year, if not longer.
Musk in turn would have an automatic buyer for his shares, and a higher price would greatly help him should he be forced to buy Twitter. Governance is not likely a problem either as the board, which includes his brother Kimbal, rarely interferes.
On Thursday, the Future Fund cofounder Gary Black penned an open letter to Tesla directors arguing for a $10 billion buyback funded out of its cash reserves rather than new debt.
Doing so would send in his words a “powerful signal that the board takes seriously its role of driving shareholder value.”
An open letter to Tesla’s Board of Directors – see attached.
With $TSLA selling at its lowest forward P/E (37x on WS 2023 EPS) since Covid, with $18.9B in cash and no debt and an investment grade rating, now seems an ideal time for Tesla’s BOD to consider a $10B+ share buyback. pic.twitter.com/NX7vKJnxOr
— Gary Black (@garyblack00) October 13, 2022
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
More from Fortune:
What is XBB? The new ‘immune-evasive’ COVID strain that combines Omicron variants is driving cases in two countries
Generation No Thanks: Millionaire millennials are giving up on stocks and bonds—and it could have ‘significant implications’ for the future
Managing Gen Z is like working with people from a ‘different country’
‘Ridiculously stupid’ economic policies have the U.S. hurtling toward a ‘perfect storm’ of economic pain, Ray Dalio says
Twitter lawyers said Musk was being investigated over acquisition conduct
Lawyers for Twitter Inc. said that Tesla Inc. Chief Executive Elon Musk was under an investigation by federal authorities in relation to his acquisition of the social-media company, according to a legal filing.
Here’s how much more U.S. households will pay to heat their homes this winter
Americans face a tough winter, with one government agency warning that most households will see a sharp increase in heating costs this year, as natural-gas prices look to post their largest yearly percentage gain in 17 years.
Wheat Is Piling Up in the US Even as World Food Crisis Alarm Blares
(Bloomberg) — The world desperately needs more grains to help temper rampant food inflation, yet there are signs that the US, a key producer, will ship the smallest amount of wheat in 50 years. Most Read from BloombergIntel Is Planning Thousands of Job Cuts in Face of PC SlumpHere’s How Weird Things Are Getting in the Housing MarketPutin Says All Infrastructure at Risk After Nord Stream HitAlex Jones Must Pay $965 Million for His Sandy Hook LiesUS Core Inflation Seen Returning to 40-Year High a
Maggie Haberman reacts to clips of Trump attacking her as a ‘third-rate reporter’
‘He wants the New York Times to approve of him,’ Haberman says
America’s arsenal is in need of life support
The key problem is Washington’s failure to procure munitions in sufficient quantities in the form of signed contracts with industry.
U.S. home heating bills expected to surge this winter: EIA
U.S. consumers can expect to pay up to 28% more to heat their homes this winter than last year due to surging fuel costs and slightly colder weather, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projected in its winter fuels outlook on Wednesday. Nearly half of U.S. households rely on natural gas for heat, with the average winter heating cost expected to rise to $931, up by 28% from last year, EIA said. The average cost to heat a home with gas last winter was $724, far cheaper than other major sources of heat.